Cyclist jumps red light and wins compensation

Cyclist jumps a red traffic light and still wins compensation – but only just.

An accident between a cyclist and a taxi car happened at a T-junction controlled by traffic lights. The taxi went across the junction on a green light when a cyclist who had jumped a red light came from his left. The cyclist was badly injured and could not say what happened.

The cyclist won his case for compensation, but he lost 80 per cent as he was found to have contributed to his injury – contributory negligence.

So how did the cyclist win his case in the first place?

The taxi was travelling between 41 and 50 miles per hour when the speed limit was 30 miles per hour. Speed is very important as the reaction, braking time and braking distance are much longer at 41 to 50 mph compared with 30 mph.

The cyclist was not wearing high visibility clothing. This was not a factor as it was the speed of the taxi which was the problem, rather than not seeing a darkly dressed cyclist. The speed limit should be seen as an indication that a driver is likely to come upon hazards and may have to slow or stop.

The other side of the argument is there would have been no accident had the cyclist not jumped a red light. There was also time for the cyclist to brake or swerve, but the evidence suggested he was not looking. It was early in the morning so maybe he thought the way would be clear.

The case illustrates the heavy duty on the driver of a vehicle which is heavy and fast, and likely to do more damage than a cyclist or a pedestrian. On this basis the driver was to blame, but the partial blame of the cyclist was put at 80 per cent. That means the cyclist who was seriously injured will only receive 20 per cent of the compensation value of his injuries and loss.

I have not seen a full transcript of the High Court Judgment but a summary is available by clicking here.

For interesting guidance from the Cycling Tourist Club please click here.

For other examples of contributory negligence please click here.

The answer in all cases is to seek good advice from a personal injury solicitor.





About Mark Thompson

Personal injury and accident specialist solicitor
This entry was posted in Cycling accidents. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Cyclist jumps red light and wins compensation

  1. Julian Ellis says:

    I would have thought that mere fact that “there would have been no accident had the cyclist not jumped a red light. There was also time for the cyclist to brake or swerve, but the evidence suggested he was not looking” would have meant no compensation whatsoever.

    Surely that trumps all?

    Although I can see that the Taxi driver was clearly breaking the speed limit. But had he been at the speed limit could the accident been avoided??
    And even if it could — so what given that it was the cyclist who jumped the light?

    The Taxi Driver is in the same situation as the rape victem – “who was high on drugs* and provocatively dressed” taking a proportion of the blame for their rape.

    But of course no-one would suggest that…

Leave a Reply to Julian Ellis Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.