Horse and rider accident with campervan

Horse and rider in accident with camper van

I come across equestrian accidents as I operate in an area where horse riding is very popular. Take a careful look at the facts of this case and decide the case for yourself. Don’t worry as I will let you know the answer.

The case I will tell you about involved a 14 year old girl called Sally. Sally had been riding horses for seven years so was an experienced rider.

Sally and her friend, Hayley, had been out riding. To get back to their yard they had to ride from a bridleway across a road, and ride along it for a short distance.

The speed limit on the road was 60 miles per hour.

Hayley crossed first without problem. Sally had hung back to practise a jump so there was a gap between the two horses emerging from the bridleway.

The vehicle was a camper van with a trailer driven at about 40 miles per hour.

There were other drivers behind the camper van. One said he knew from experience that riders often rode in pairs so he slowed in case a second horse appeared. All vehicles slowed when the first horse appeared and crossed the road, but the camper van then sped up again.

Sally rode her horse out into the road at a trot and collided with the camper van. She had not looked before emerging from the bridleway, she made a mistake. Sally was injured.

So judge this one for yourself.

Despite the Judge finding Sally had made a mistake the answer is the camper van driver was found to blame. He was well within the speed limit, but was driving too fast to stop if a second horse emerged. He was probably driving too fast if he was going to overtake the first horse. The fact other drivers slowed and the camper van accelerated was very significant.

So the rider wins her case, but what about her own fault. The Judge said 50 per cent blame on the rider’s part.

This was a High Court decision which went to the Court of Appeal on the 50 per cent contributory negligence finding alone. To change the decision of a Judge the Court of Appeal must find the decision was not open to the Judge on the facts or law in the case, so the decision stood. The decision reflects the heavy duty on the driver of a vehicle which is a “potentially dangerous weapon.”

Every case is different and depends on its own facts. Please do not make a judgment on your own case and let an experienced personal injury solicitor help you.

For the full case decision in Stoddart v Perucca.

For other contributory negligence examples.

Image source –



Motorcycle filtering through traffic

Motorcycle, scooter and moped filtering in and past traffic

Filtering through traffic is one of the many advantages of riding a motorcycle, a scooter, or a moped. The downside is that it is one of the most dangerous things you can do. Drivers fail to see bikes at the best of times, let alone when you are approaching in a way they do not expect. Drivers who ride motorcycles understand, but drivers who only drive are constantly surprised by what riders can do, and they fail to take that into account. They do not think bike, or bicycle for that matter.Risk of motorcycle filtering through traffic Continue reading “Motorcycle filtering through traffic”

Google sued over walking directions

Woman sues Google over Utah walking directions

I came across a news report about a law suit in the United States against Google complaining its Google Map had given an unsafe pedestrian route.

Extract from the report of 1 June 2010 reads:Image shows pedestrians crossing road

Salt Lake City — A pedestrian injured by a motorist while following an online route has filed a lawsuit claiming Google Inc. supplied unsafe directions. Continue reading “Google sued over walking directions”