Compensation

Compensation explained

Politics of compensation

Newspaper headlines tell you of large compensation awards, fraudulent claims, or the rising cost of road accident claims to insurers. What you do not read is how organisations are reimbursed as a result of a compensation case being brought.

After a road accident the Government can recover up to £505  for accident and emergency treatment, and £620 per day  for inpatient treatment. The maximum recoverable is £37,100. An additional payment for ambulance call out is £159.   The money is only paid if the person treated by the NHS makes a successful claim. The payment is made by the insurance company of the party responsible for the accident or injury.

When state benefits are paid after an accident or injury they are repaid to the Government by the insurance company of the person or party responsible for the injury. This can be a little complicated as not all benefits are repayable. The system is called “recoupment” as the benefits are recouped when a compensation case is successful. You claim your financial losses, the benefits you have received are deducted from those losses, and the insurance company pays the benefits back to the Government. You should view the benefits you receive as payments on account of compensation. The advantage of benefits is you receive them because you are injured, and you receive them immediately. You only get compensation if you can prove someone is at fault, and the payment is usually received when the case ends.

Some employer contracts mean sick pay received after an accident for which you recover compensation, is repayable to the employer. Be careful your solicitor checks with the employer to avoid an unnecessary squabble with your employer. Do not worry about these clauses as they are quite common. The sum due to the employer is added to the calculation of the claim. The insurance company for the person or party responsible pays, so you still recover your actual losses.

Medical insurers, like our friends at BUPA, have a clause which means you are liable to repay their outlay for treatment after an accident for which you recover compensation. If your case is successful you must repay your insurer. Just like the employer situation you include the expenditure in your claim, and is is repaid to the medical insurer. The repayment is effectively made by the insurance company of the person or party responsible for your injury.

Insurance companies regularly recover their expense. If your car has to be repaired after an accident which is someone else’s fault, you might turn to your own fully comprehensive insurance company to cover the cost. If you have an injury or other losses you can claim against the person at fault, and when you succeed your own insurer is repaid for their outlay. This is a positive for you, as once repaid, your own insurer will not penalise you for claiming on your policy. Insurance companies make claims too.

Insurance companies used to operate a “knock for knock” arrangement for motor policies. An insurer would say to itself that its drivers were going to be involved in accidents, some would be their driver’s fault, and some would not. Rather than squabbling with other insurance companies why not cover our own losses. It was a sensible arrangement between the insurance companies, as it kept their costs down. Whether it suited the motorist is another question, as your insurer might treat you as having made a claim on your policy even when the accident was not your fault. In recent times the “knock for knock” agreements have fallen away, as new insurers have entered the market and not wanted to play by the old rules. It can mean that if you claim on your own policy when someone else is at fault you will be penalised when you renew, as your insurer has paid out on your policy. If you want to avoid this you have to seek compensation, and it is not the responsibility of the insurer to recover their expense.

Insurance companies receive income by referring compensation cases to solicitors. It is perfectly legitimate to pay and receive referral fees so long as those involved satisfy the Referral Fee and Claims Management regulations. This means you should be told that a referral fee is being charged, or paid, and how much. It does feel odd that insurance companies complain on the one hand about the number of compensation claims being made, and on the other identify people who can make claims and refer them to solicitors in return for payment. Short term business is about income, so who can blame the insurers. Estimating conservatively the average referral fee for a road traffic accident case is £700.

Trade Unions are in favour of compensation claims. They provide a service to their membership, and if the cases are managed properly they can make money. In the explanation of conditional fee agreements and after the event insurance it is explained how the cost of that insurance is paid for in addition to your solicitors costs. Trade Unions are doing the same job as an after the event insurer, as the Trade Union would pick up your legal bill if the case failed. In return for that risk a Trade Union can recover a premium equivalent in successful cases. The system is designed to allow the union to build a fighting fund to pay for the costs in failed cases. If they do not lose money the system means income for the trade union. Not all unions operate this system, and if they do the premium equivalent will vary, but £500 per case looks like a conservative estimate.

Claims management companies exist to attract those who may have compensation claims. You have seen their advertising and catchy slogans. They have very effectively put themselves between the solicitor and their client. Many solicitors have given up on any form of marketing, and just buy cases from the claims management companies. Claims management is a perfectly legitimate business, only recently regulated. Regulation is designed to stop cold calling and silly promises. The referral fees charged to solicitors plus other income from insurance and expert evidence agency arrangements conservatively amount to £1,000 per case. You should not pay for any of this expense. It is the solicitors expense, and you should not see any deduction from your compensation. If your arrangement means you pay anything you should say no. The referral fee is the solicitors marketing expense, not yours.

Credit hire companies provide vehicles, and undertake repairs, after an accident for which someone is to blame. They fall under the claims management company umbrella. If they refer personal injury cases they fall under the same regulation. It is an interesting business, based on you being blameless, and someone else being responsible. Lets say your car or motorcycle is off the road for repairs and you need a replacement car or motorcycle for a fortnight. Your own insurer may not be keen to give a courtesy car, and the body shop has none available. Do you take taxis or hire a car, or do you use credit hire? If you take a credit hire you sign an agreement accepting liability for the cost of hire. If the hirer is confident someone else is to blame, and insurance is in place, they will provide a vehicle. The idea is to recover the hire from the insurer of the person to blame, and you pay nothing. Credit repair may also be available on a similar basis. Credit hire companies do get criticised for their hire rates, but to be fair they do exist because insurers will not pay for alternative transport when your car or motorcycle is in for repair.

Alternative transport may be offered by your own insurance company. However, if you have bought your insurance policy on price do not expect first class service. If an insurance company offers a courtesy car the expense is usually covered by the body shop doing your repairs, or by a credit hire company. The insurance companies have found ways of providing a service without bearing the cost. That is to their credit as it allows them to be competitive on premiums. There are good and bad credit hire companies. For them to be paid you must be liable to pay the hire. You must beware of ending up with the bill in your hand. Take advice from an experienced solicitor who knows the work of the credit hire company.

Good or bad thing

The need to seek compensation must be a bad thing, but the ability to recover it must be a good thing.

Nobody wants to be injured so nobody wants compensation. If something does go wrong then compensation can help put things right, but only financially. The big awards you see in the newspapers are for people who require expensive care regimes. They do not receive £3 million plus because their injury was awful, they receive it because they are young and will have to spend it on a care regime which allows some semblance of independence. The most serious injury is rarely worth more than £250,000, so in a big award you will see most of the money is for future expense. £3 million might look like a lot of money, but when you understand how the system works you would not trade it in exchange for a future without disability.

There are many causes of brain injury. Acquired brain injury is a term which covers all situations in which brain injury has occurred since birth, and includes injury from trauma/injury, as well as tumour, stroke, haemorrhage and encephalitis, as examples.

This post deals with injury caused by accidents, sometimes called traumatic brain injury. You might think the trauma has to be significant, but experience shows what looks like a minor event can cause an injury.

Brain injury is first caused by outside force, but then complications can follow, such as damage caused by lack of oxygen, and rising pressure and swelling in the brain.

The effects are described at different levels of severity using mild, moderate and severe. We find the mild injuries most difficult as the problem is not always spotted early. Medical staff tend to deal with the physical injury but do not spot the acquired brain injury. A minor injury (15 minutes unconscious or 1 hour post trauma memory loss), can mean symptoms including nausea, headaches, dizziness, impaired concentration, memory problems, extreme tiredness, intolerance to light and noise, and can lead to anxiety and depression. Not minor problems really. Help and support is necessary, but of course the problem has to be spotted. Most minor injuries will have recovered within 4 to 6 months.

A moderate injury (up to 6 hours unconscious or up to 24 hours post trauma memory loss) has symptoms including tiredness, headaches and dizziness. Add to these difficulties with thinking, attention, memory planning, organising, concentration and word-finding problems. These symptoms are accompanied by understandable worry and anxiety, leading to anxiety. If the problem is spotted early and the likely effects explained, the path of the injured person can be smoothed. Without that warning every day life can be very difficult. Overall recovery is likely in most cases but may take up to 9 months.

You will appreciate your solicitor must have an understanding and experience of the effects of such an injury. Without that how are we to work together?

You will see from the list below there are organisations whose focus is on children. The treatment of head injuries has a divide based on age. Paediatric departments tend to lose interest beyond the age of sixteen, and the adult services may not be ready to provide the support. There are educational needs which may have to be pursued vigorously if the best outcome is to be achieved. A child is represented through their parents, but as before, an acute awareness of the needs of such an injured child is necessary if the compensation process is to help.

There are some very informative sites of organisations whose main interest is head injury so do learn more at:

A fatal accident caused by the fault of another can be compensated. The people entitled and how much compensation is due must be considered carefully. Most of the rules are set by Statute, and it is a shame the law has not kept up to date with social change. I hope there will be changes in the future which help all those left in difficult circumstances by a fatal accident.

The law set out below is current at July 2009. The law was different before, and may be different after, so use this page for information and contact us to weigh up your own circumstances.

There are two statutes which outline what can be recovered. These are Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 and the Fatal Accidents Act 1976. Both Acts have been amended and updated.

1. The Law Reform legislation means that death does not bring to an end a persons ability to recover compensation for injury and loss. This law is only relevant where death is not instantaneous. It would allow the representatives of a deceased person to recover compensation for injury and financial loss between an accident/injury and death. The action is brought by the deceased’s Estate, by Executors if there is a Will, and Personal Representatives if there is no will (known as intestacy). The principles which apply to calculating compensation for injury and loss are the same as those used for claimants who are alive.

The Fatal Accidents Act allows two further claims claims to be made, but the relationships between individuals are important.

2. In the case of a death after 1 January 2008 a bereavement award of £11,800 is payable to the spouse or civil partner of the deceased, or if the deceased was below 18 years of age and had not married, the parents are entitled to this award. Please note that at this time “partners,” and/or “common law” husbands or wives are not entitled to a bereavement award.

3. Reasonable funeral expenses can be recovered.

4. The Fatal Accidents Act then allows a claim to be brought for financial “dependants” of the deceased. Again the persons who may be entitled are defined, and more liberally than the persons entitled to the bereavement award. Dependants are:

(a) the wife or husband or former wife or husband of the deceased (and Civil Partners);

(b) any person who—

(i) was living with the deceased in the same household immediately before the date of the death; and

(ii) had been living with the deceased in the same household for at least two years before that date; and

(iii) was living during the whole of that period as the husband or wife of the deceased;

(c) any parent or other ascendant of the deceased;

(d) any person who was treated by the deceased as his parent;

(e) any child or other descendant of the deceased;

(f) any person (not being a child of the deceased) who, in the case of any marriage to which the deceased was at any time a party, was treated by the deceased as a child of the family in relation to that marriage;

(g) any person who is, or is the issue of, a brother, sister, uncle or aunt of the deceased.

The section above is a direct quote from the legislation, except for the addition of Civil partners too point (a).

You will appreciate great care has to be taken to establish who is entitled to compensation.

You may seek compensation for the loss of financial support if you are a dependant. Compensation is awarded for the loss of the victim’s financial support and services since his or her death. This consists of the portion of the deceased’s income devoted to the family or dependants, the home and other outgoings, together with compensation for any services that the victim provided, such as childcare, domestic assistance, gardening or DIY.

The financial basis for dependancy varies in each case so it would be misleading to set out guideline figures.

Only one action can be brought in respect of a death, so it is vital that all possible claims are identified.

The action can be brought by the Executors or Personal Representatives, but if they do not take up the case, those entitled under the rules may put forward the case, but the warning above should be noted.

Two young men died in a lift shaft at a council owned block of flats.

After a fatal accident the facts unravelled as the Police, Health and Safety Executive, and Coroner made their investigations.

The two men were scuffling after a party, fell against a lift door which opened like a cat-flap, and they fell down 14 floors. Mark Thompson acted for the partner and child of one of the two men.

Helping after such a tragic accident requires empathy and experience. There was no bereavement award in the case as the man was over 18 years and unmarried. A financial dependancy claim was possible as the couple had a child, and had been living together for more than two years “as husband and wife.”

Cases like this usually proceed slowly as the investigations must take their course. The investigations could lead to criminal prosecution so those involved will not make a move until all is clear. Sometimes a Coroner will proceed with the Inquest, but will often wait for investigations and prosecutions to take their course. That is bad news for someone relying on a claim for compensation as two years can pass before the Inquest takes place. It is only after the Inquest that all evidence can be obtained.

This sad case was successful, and run on a conditional fee agreement.

The media reported the rare case of Linda Walker whose Geordie accent had turned Jamaican after suffering a stroke.

She was diagnosed with Foreign Accent Syndrome, a rare neurological condition that is caused by damage to the brain.

Having grown up in the Westerhope area of Newcastle she had naturally acquired a Geordie accent. She had spoken with this accent for over 60 years of her life.

When she found out that it had changed to a Jamaican accent she became very down and no longer felt like she was the same person. She felt that she had lost her identity.

The result of Foreign Accent Syndrome is a drawing out or clipping of the vowels that mimic the accent of a particular country, such as Spain or France, even though the sufferer has limited exposure to that accent. The syndrome was first identified during the Second World War when a Norwegian woman suffered shrapnel damage to her brain. She developed a German accent, which led to her being ostracised by her community.

It is a rare result of an acquired brain injury. When people suffer from this rare condition it is often hard for others to understand just how serious the affects can be.

A motorcyclist suffered a catalogue of physical injuries, but most serious long term was a head injury.

The rider was overtaking a tractor which turned right across him, and then ran him over. By establishing the tractor did not indicate, Mark Thompson secured a compensation settlement in excess of £1 million for the motorcyclist.

The defence argued excessive speed, almost an automatic argument when a motorcyclist is involved.

The serious effects meant the rider lost the ability to continue with his career. He required adapted housing and might need long term care if he becomes wheelchair dependent. Add to this an acquired brain injury, and a simple u-turn had very serious consequences. The head injury was important even though the effects were subtle. Such injury can bring about a change in personality, a heightened level of aggression and less inhibition. Judgment is often an issue, and that has to be borne in mind when a large sum in compensation is won.

Mark successfully settled this case using evidence from a range of doctors, employers, former employers, financial and pension advisers.

The settlement allowed for interim payments to be made during the action to allow for the purchase of an appropriate home, and the necessary adaptations, plus an adapted vehicle.

Ultimate settlement provided the motorcyclist with a regular tax free income guaranteed for life (called a structured settlement). The settlement was set up in a Trust to allow state benefits to continue to be paid, despite the large capital sum won in compensation.

It was vital to ensure this man’s future was protected. The after effects of the accident were traumatic, the lawyers job in such a case being to ensure a complete framework for the clients future.

Newer entries »

Proudly using Dynamic Headers by Nicasio Design